Free speech is either free speech both ways or not at all. Art is subjective, what one person finds objective or hates is exactly the point. Weak to break it down in terms of gender, race, and sexual orientation. Stronger to discuss re-appropriation for commercial purposes. Bottom line: it was talked about, and isn’t that the goal of artifice in the first place? To be looked at, thought about, and talked about? The Frida Kahlo With A Gun mash-up mural checked all the boxes. Didn’t see a mention yet as to how the appropriation of a Rising Sun inspired background in the mural could be harmful or degrading to those who identify as Japanese or are of Japanese decent.